Your IP : 216.73.217.79


Current Path : /var/www/cesa.co.za/cceadmin/moderations/
Upload File :
Current File : /var/www/cesa.co.za/cceadmin/moderations/m3_a01_introduction_to_sa_law_mr_20200723.xls

��ࡱ�>��	C��������<=>?@AB������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������	ZO������\pJulia                                                                                                        B�a�=	

�ThisWorkbook���=���]u!8X@�"��1���Calibri1���Calibri1���Calibri1���Calibri1�
��Calibri1���Calibri1@��Calibri1���Calibri1�
��Calibri1���Calibri1��Calibri1���Calibri1@��Calibri1h��Calibri1h��Calibri1��Calibri1����Calibri18��Calibri1���Calibri1>��Calibri1>��Calibri1
��Calibri1���Verdana1���Calibri1���Arial1���Arial1�	��Verdana1���Verdana1���Calibri1���Calibri1���Arial1���Calibri1���Calibri1(�
��Arial Narrow1����Calibri1(����Arial Narrow1�
��Calibri1�
��Calibri1
��Calibri1���Calibri1���Arial1�
��Arial1���Arial1���Arial1���Arial1�
��Arial1�
��Arial1���Arial1����Arial1�
��Arial1@
��Arial1>��Arial1>��Arial1��Arial1
��Arial1�>��Arial1���Arial1���Calibri1�
��Arial1���Arial1�
��Arial1�
��Calibri1�
��Calibri1���Calibri1���Calibri1���Calibri1���Calibri1h8��Cambria1,8��Calibri18��Calibri1�8��Calibri1���Calibri1���Calibri1�<��Calibri1�>��Calibri1�?��Calibri1�4��Calibri1�4��Calibri1�	��Calibri1���Calibri1�	��Calibri1���Calibri1h��Calibri"�"#,##0;\-"�"#,##0"�"#,##0;[Red]\-"�"#,##0"�"#,##0.00;\-"�"#,##0.00#"�"#,##0.00;[Red]\-"�"#,##0.005*0_-"�"* #,##0_-;\-"�"* #,##0_-;_-"�"* "-"_-;_-@_-,)'_-* #,##0_-;\-* #,##0_-;_-* "-"_-;_-@_-=,8_-"�"* #,##0.00_-;\-"�"* #,##0.00_-;_-"�"* "-"??_-;_-@_-4+/_-* #,##0.00_-;\-* #,##0.00_-;_-* "-"??_-;_-@_-�0.0�
yy/mm/dd;@�yyyy\-mm\-dd;@�yyyy/mm/dd;@!�#,##0.00_ ;[Red]\-#,##0.00\ ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � ��� � � � ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� ��� �� �Q�� �� �Q�� �� �Q�� �� �Q�� �� �Q�� �� �Q�� �� �I�� �� �M�� ���� �O�� �ff��� �+�� �� �)�� �� �,�� �� �*�� �� �P�� �� �C�� �� �H�� �� �E�� �P� �F�� �P� �G�� � � �G�� �� ��� �� �K�� ���� �N�� �`� �J�� �� ��� �� �L�� ���� �	�� �� �D�� �� �
�� �a>� ��� �� �  � �
0� �
8� � � �
0@ @ � �

x@ @ 	 � @
 � @� �0� �
8� �x� �

x@ @ 2 �x"@ @ 3 �t"@ @ 3 �t"@ @ 3 �0� � � � � �
8""@ @ � �t"@ @ 	 �x@ @  �(� �0@ @ � �"p@ @ 
 �0� �0� �4� ��t@ @ 
 ��"t@ @ 
 �"8� �
"8""@ @ � �p@ @ 
 �1t@ @ 
 �0� �"x� �"x� � h� � h� � `� �x� �p@ @ � �0� �0� �
x �"8""@ @ � �|@ @ � �x!@ @ 3 �� D� �x @@  �aP �x @@  �x @@  �ap @@  �aP �x @@ 	 �x @@ 	 �ap @@ 	 �aP	 �| @@  �| @@ 	 �8" @ @ � �8" @ @ � �8  @ @ � �x @@ 7 �x @@ 7 �ap @@ 7 �aP7 �8"@ @ � �   @@ � �x �x �ap � @	 �x @@ 	 � @ �x @@  � @ �x @@  � @7 �x @@ 7 �x @@ 7 �x	 �x �x �ap �ap	 �
�
|""@ @ � �x@ @ 	 �x@ @ 	 �
x@ @ 7 �x@ @ 7 �x@ @ 7 �x"@ @  �  h@ @ �  h@ @ 3�@x@ @ 3�@x@ @ �  h@ @ �@x@ @ �  h@ @ +�@x@ @ +�"|@ @ 3 �"x@ @ 3 �  h@ @ �@x@ @ ��t@ @ 
 ��"t@ @ 
 �"p@ @ 
 ��t@ @ 
 ��"t@ @ 
 �"p@ @ 
 �@x@ @ �@x@ @ 3�@x@ @ �@x@ @ �@x@ @ +��t@ @ 
 �0@ @ � �p@ @ � �	x@ @ 3 �t@ @ 3 ��t@ @ 	 ��t@ @ � �t!@ @ 3 ��@ @ 3 �x!@ @  �x"@ @  �x"@ @  �x!"@ @  �
x@ @ � �t@ @ 
 ��t!@ @ 
 �0@ @ � �14@ @ � �0@ @ � �t@ @ 
 ��t!@ @ 
 �
Zx @ @ 3 �t"@ @ 3 �t@ @ 3 �
Zx!"@ @ 3 ��"t@ @ 
 �
Zx!"@ @ 3 �"p!@ @ 
 �
x@ @ 7 �x@ @ 7 �*x@ @ 	 �(x@ @ � �*x@ @ 	 �(x@ @ � �
x"@ @  �
x@ @  �� �� �	@x@ @ � � x@ @ � �	@x@ @ � � x@ @ � �P� �p� �� �0� �

x"@ @ � �

x"@ @ > ��t@ @ 
 ��t@ @ 
 �"p!@ @ 
 �
Zx""@ @ 3 ��t@ @ 
 ��t"@ @ 
 �!8D@ @ � �!8D@ @ � �!8 D@ @ � � (D@ @ � � (D@ @ � � ($@ @ � � ($@ @ � � ( $@ @ � �8B@ @ � �8B@ @ � �4 B@ @ � �8D@ @ � �8D@ @ � �4 D@ @ � �   D@ @ � �
x@ @  �x@ @  �x@ @  �!�|"@ @  �!�|"@ @  �!�|!"@ @  �(x!@ @ � �(x!@ @ � �28� �+ (� �+ � �+x �+x �4 (D@ @ � �4 (D@ @ � �6 (� �4!8D@ @ � �4!8D@ @ � �4 ($@ @ � �4 ($@ @ � �4!8$@ @ � �(� � (� � � �&�|@ @ 	 �
x �
x!"@ @  �+� �+� �"� �  � � �"|� � � �9@� � 	�"x� �/x� �(X� � H� �
x@ @  �
x@ @  �
|@ @  �:x @ @  �)� �� �0@ @ � �08@ @ � �08@ @ � �*� �08@ @ � �08@ @ � �0� �*x@ @ 	�(� �*� �1x@ @ � �1|@ @ � �1x@ @ � �1x@ @ � �1|@ @ � �1x@ @ � �1x!@ @ � �1|!@ @ � �1x!@ @ � �0� �,x""@ @  �&x@ @ � �<
� �<x"@ @  �<x @ @  �t"@ @ 	 �!x@ @  �x@ @  �
x @ @  �x@ @ 	 �0� �x@ @ 7 �p@ @ 
 �
x@ @ 	 �x@ @ 	 �p@ @ 
 �
x@ @  �x@ @ � �x@ @ � �x@ @ 	 �0!@ @ � �x @ @  �14!@ @ � �0!@ @ � �14!!@ @ � �t@ @ 	 �0@ @ � �14!@ @ � �*x!@ @ 	 �(x!@ @ � �(x!!@ @ � �x""@ @  �"p!@ @ 
 �"p!@ @ 
 �"p!!@ @ 
 �
Zx@ @ 3 �
Zx@ @ 3 �t"@ @ 3 �t"@ @ 3 �

x"@ @ 	 �

x!"@ @ 	 ��"t@ @ 
 ��t!@ @ 
 �

|@ @ 3 �� D� �(x"@ @  �(|@ @  �<x@ @  �;	|@ @ � �/x	 �8(x	 �3x	 �4!8� �4 (� �4)8� �
� �
x @ @  �
X �

x@ @  �/8@ @ � �/8!@ @ � �
Zx3 ��"t@ @ 
 ��"t!@ @ 
 �"p@ @ 
 �"p@ @ 
 �"p!@ @ 
 �"p@ @ 
 �t"@ @ 
 �t"@ @ 
 �t"!@ @ 
 �

|@ @ 3 �
Zx@ @ 3 ��t@ @ 
 ��t!@ @ 
 �0"@ @ � �0"@ @ � �0"!@ @ � �(x!@ @ 3 �0@ @ � �0@ @ � �(x"@ @ 3 �(|@ @  �0!@ @ � �(�| @ @  �(�| @ @  �(�| !@ @  �(t@ @ 
 �(t@ @ 
 �(t"@ @ 
 �(t!@ @ 
 �/8!@ @ � �/8!!@ @ � �,
x@ @  �,
x!@ @  �8@ @ � �x@ @ � �	@x@ @ � �	@x@ @ � �
x@ @  �%
x@ @ �
x@ @  �$
|@ @ � �$
x@ @ � �#
x@ @ � �x!@ @ � �#
x!@ @ � �$
|!@ @ � �$
x!@ @ � �8!@ @ � �x!@ @ � �x!!@ @ � �)x@ @ � �)x@ @  �)x@ @  �+� �,� �+
� �,
� �
8@ @ � �
8!@ @ � �
8@ @ � �
8!@ @ � �
8!@ @ � �
8!!@ @ � �/	<@ @ � �/	<@ @ � �/		<@ @ � �=	<@ @ � �/	<!@ @ � �x@ @  �x@ @  �x!@ @  �
x""@ @ 3 �!
x@ @  �<x@ @  �=x@ @ �!
x@ @  �!
x"@ @  �!
x@ @  �&�|"!@ @ 	 �@� �A� �?�<!@ @ � �?�<"!@ @ � �?�<!@ @ � �.x@ @ 	�>x@ @ 	 �>x@ @ 	 �>x@ @ 	 �.x@ @ 	 �>8@ @ � �>8@ @ � �>8@ @ � �>8@ @ � �/
8@ @ � �/
8!@ @ � �,
x@ @  �+
x!@ @  �
x@ @  �
p!@ @  �
p@ @  �,
x@ @  �+
x@ @  �,x"@ @  �,x!"@ @  �/
8@ @ � �/
8!@ @ � �>8@ @ � �>8@ @ � �>8@ @ � �/
8!@ @ � �/
8!!@ @ � �x!@ @  �x!@ @  �x!!@ @  �x@ @  �x@ @  �x @ @  �/x`@ @ 	 �/x`@ @ 	 �8x&@ @ 	 �8x&@ @ 	 �8(x&@ @ 	 �>8!@ @ � �>8!@ @ � �>8@ @ � �4)8D@ @ � �4)8D@ @ � �4!8B@ @ � �4!8B@ @ � �3x"@ @ 	 �3x"@ @ 	 �8@ @ � �8@ @ � �x@ @  �x@ @  �p"@ @  �	<"@ @ � �	<"@ @ � �	< "@ @ � �

x"@ @  �

x "@ @  �x"@ @  �>8@ @ � �x"@ @  �<x @ @  �<x  @ @  �0� �x"@ @  �p"@ @  �8"@ @ � �8 "@ @ � �x"@ @  �x"@ @  �x"@ @  �	<"@ @ � �
x"@ @  �
x`"@ @  �x!@ @ � �x!@ @ � �x!@ @ � �x&@ @ � �x&@ @ � �x &@ @ � �x@ @ � �x@ @ � �x "@ @  �B8� �x@ @ � �x@ @ � �x @ @ � ��t"@ @ 	 �x@ @  �p �
"x@ @ 3 �
"x3 �4@ @ � �0!@ @ � �t!@ @ 	 �t!!@ @ 	 �p "@ @  �8"@ @ � �8" @ @ � ||-�aC}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}	
 -;_-* "}-}

 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}

 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}<
 -;_-* "}-}6

 -;_-* "}-}@
 -;_-* "}-}A
 -;_-* "}-}B
 -;_-* "}-}C
 -;_-* "}-}D
 -;_-* "}A}E
 -;_-* "-@_-    }A}F
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }-}G
 -;_-* "}-}H
 -;_-* "}-}I
 -;_-* "}-}J
 -;_-* "}A}K
 -;_-* "��P�-@_-    }A}L
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }A}M
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }A}N
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }-}O
 -;_-* "}-}P
 -;_-* "}-}Q
 -;_-* "}-}R
 -;_-* "}A}S
 -;_-* "-@_-    }A}T
 -;_-* "��-@_-    }-}U
 -;_-* "}-}V
 -;_-* "}A}W
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }-}X
 -;_-* "}-}Y
 -;_-* "}-}Z
 -;_-* "}A}[
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }A}\
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }-}]
 -;_-* "}-}^
 -;_-* "}A}_
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }A}`
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }-}a
 -;_-* "}-}b
 -;_-* "}}c}}d}-}e
 -;_-* "}-}f
 -;_-* "}-}g
�� -;_-* "}-}h
 -;_-* "}-}i
 -;_-* "}-}j
 -;_-* "}A}k
 -;_-* "��-@_-    }-}l
 -;_-* "}-}m
 -;_-* "}A}n
 -;_-* "���-@_-    }-}o
 -;_-* "}P}p
� -;_-* "������-@_
���        }A}q

 -;_-* "���-@_
}P}r
� -;_-* "�����-@_
���        }P}s
� -;_-* "�����-@_
���        }U}t

 -;_-* "��-@_

���        }A}u

 -;_-* "��-@_
}P}v
� -;_-* "������-@_
������   }P}w
� -;_-* "������-@_
������   }U}x

 -;_-* "����-@_

���        }A}y

 -;_-* "����-@_
}P}z
� -;_-* "������-@_
������   }P}{
� -;_-* "��������-@_
������   }(}|
 -;_-* "}(}}
 -;_-* "}(}~
 -;_-* "}P}
���� -;_-* "��������-@_
������   }P}�
���� -;_-* "��������-@_
������   }U}�

 -;_-* "����-@_

���        }A}�

 -;_-* "����-@_
}(}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "
���-@_
}<}�
� -;_-* "�����-@_}<}�
� -;_-* "�����-@_}A}�

 -;_-* "��-@_
}A}�
 -;_-* "-@_
}P}�
� -;_-* "-@_
������   }A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_
}P}�
� -;_-* "���-@_
������   }A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_
}P}�
� -;_-* "���-@_
������   }A}�
 -;_-* "�-@_
}P}�
� -;_-* "��-@_
������   }P}�
 -;_-* "��-@_
������   }<}�
� -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
� -;_-* "����-@_}<}�
� -;_-* "����-@_}A}�

 -;_-* "���-@_
}A}�

 -;_-* "����-@_
}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "-@_
}<}�
� -;_-* "-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "�-@_
}A}�
� -;_-* "�-@_
}<}�
� -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_
}P}�
 -;_-* "����-@_����   }P}�
 -;_-* "�մ��-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "�մ��-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "����-@_����   }P}�
 -;_-* "���-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "���-@_����   }P}�
 -;_-* "�����-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "�����-@_����   }<}�
�� -;_-* "�L	�-@_}<}�
�� -;_-* "�L	�-@_}P}�
 -;_-* "����-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "����-@_����   }A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}P}�
� -;_-* "������-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "�մ����-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "������-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "�����-@_����   }P}�
� -;_-* "�������-@_����   }A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}<}�
�� -;_-* "�L	���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
�� -;_-* "ef-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}�
�� -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "�-@_}A}�
� -;_-* "�-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "-@_}-}�
� -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "-@_}-}�
� -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}(}�
 -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}(}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}�
� -;_-* "}-}
� -;_-* "}(}
�� -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}<}
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}
 -;_-* "���-@_}(}
� -;_-* "}(}
� -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}	
� -;_-* "}(}

� -;_-* "}(}
� -;_-* "}(}
� -;_-* "}(}

� -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}A}
�� -;_-* "-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
� -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}(}
� -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
�� -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}(}
 -;_-* "}A}
 -;_-* "-@_}A} 
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}!
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}"
 -;_-* "��-@_}(}#
 -;_-* "}(}$
� -;_-* "}-}%
 -;_-* "}(}&
� -;_-* "}(}'
� -;_-* "}(}(
 -;_-* "}(})
� -;_-* "}(}*
� -;_-* "}-}+
 -;_-* "}P},
�� -;_-* "�����-@_����   }(}-
 -;_-* "}(}.
 -;_-* "}-}8
 -;_-* "}<}9
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}:
�� -;_-* "}(};
 -;_-* "}<}<
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}=
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}>
 -;_-* "-@_}A}?
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}@
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}A
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}B
�� -;_-* "-@_}-}C
 -;_-* "}<}D
� -;_-* "�-@_}A}E
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}F
 -;_-* "-@_}<}G
� -;_-* "-@_}A}H
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}I
 -;_-* "��-@_}(}J
� -;_-* "}(}K
� -;_-* "}<}L
� -;_-* "�-@_}-}M
 -;_-* "}A}N
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}O
 -;_-* "}-}P
 -;_-* "}-}Q
 -;_-* "}A}R
 -;_-* "-@_}-}S
 -;_-* "}-}T
 -;_-* "}A}U
 -;_-* "-@_}-}V
� -;_-* "}-}W
� -;_-* "}A}X
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}Y
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}Z
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}[
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}\
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}]
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}^
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}_
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}`
 -;_-* "-@_}A}a
 -;_-* "-@_}A}b
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}c
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}d
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}e
 -;_-* "}A}f
 -;_-* "�P�-@_}A}g
 -;_-* "�P�-@_}<}h
 -;_-* "���P�-@_}(}i
�� -;_-* "}<}j
�� -;_-* "�P�-@_}<}k
� -;_-* "�P�-@_}<}l
�� -;_-* "�P�-@_}(}m
� -;_-* "}(}n
� -;_-* "}(}o
� -;_-* "}-}p
 -;_-* "}A}q
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}r
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}s
 -;_-* "��-@_}(}t
�� -;_-* "}(}u
�� -;_-* "}A}v
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}w
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}x
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}y
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}z
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}{
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}|
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}}
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}~
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "�P�-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "�P�-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "�P�-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "�P�-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}<}�
 -;_-* "�����-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "�����-@_}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}P}�
�� -;_-* "����-@_����   }A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}<}�
 -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}(}�
 -;_-* "}(}�
 -;_-* "}(}�
 -;_-* "}(}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}P}�
�� -;_-* "����-@_����   }A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
�� -;_-* "-@_}-}�
23 -;_-* "}-}�
p�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}P}�
�� -;_-* "����-@_����   }A}�
�� -;_-* "-@_}A}�
�� -;_-* "-@_}A}�
�� -;_-* "-@_}<}�
�� -;_-* "-@_}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}<}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
�� -;_-* "}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}�
�� -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
�� -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
� -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
� -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
� -;_-* "�-@_}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}-}�
�� -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}(}�
� -;_-* "}<}�
�� -;_-* "�-@_}<}�
�� -;_-* "�-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}�
 -;_-* "}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}�
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}�
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}
�� -;_-* "}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}<}
 -;_-* "���-@_}<}
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}	
 -;_-* "}A}

 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}
 -;_-* "}-}

 -;_-* "}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}
 -;_-* "}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
�� -;_-* "}-}
�� -;_-* "}-}
�� -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}-}
 -;_-* "}A}
 -;_-* "��-@_}(}
p�� -;_-* "}-}
�� -;_-* "}-}
�� -;_-* "}-} 
�� -;_-* "}A}!
 -;_-* "-@_}A}"
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}#
 -;_-* "��-@_}A}$
 -;_-* "���-@_}A}%
 -;_-* "���-@_}-}&
 -;_-* "}-}'
 -;_-* "}A}(
 -;_-* "-@_}A})
 -;_-* "-@_}A}*
 -;_-* "��-@_}(}+
 -;_-* "}(},
 -;_-* "}-}0
 -;_-* "}-}+
 -;_-* "}-},
 -;_-* "}-}-
 -;_-* "}-}.
 -;_-* "}-}=
 -;_-* "}A}2
 -;_-* "-@_}A}3
 -;_-* "�?-@_}A}4
 -;_-* "23-@_}-}5
 -;_-* "}A}1
a� -;_-* "���-@_}A}(
�� -;_-* "���-@_}A}9
�W� -;_-* "��-@_}�}7
??v� -;_-* "�̙�-@_�        �        	�
�}�};
???� -;_-* "���-@_???�        ???�        	???�
???�}�})
�}� -;_-* "���-@_�        �        	�
�}A}8
�}� -;_-* "���-@_}�}*
 -;_-* "����-@_???�        ???�        	???�
???�}-}?
�� -;_-* "}�}:
 -;_-* "���-@_����        ����        	����
����}-}/
� -;_-* "}U}>
 -;_-* "-@_        }A}"
 -;_-* "-@_}A}
 -;_-* "ef-@_}A}
 -;_-* "�L-@_}A}
 -;_-* "23-@_}A}#
 -;_-* "-@_}A}
 -;_-* "ef-@_}A}
 -;_-* "�L-@_}A}
 -;_-* "23-@_}A}$
 -;_-* "-@_}A}
 -;_-* "ef-@_}A}
 -;_-* "�L-@_}A}
 -;_-* "23-@_}A}%
 -;_-* "-@_}A}
 -;_-* "ef-@_}A}
 -;_-* "�L-@_}A}
 -;_-* "23-@_}A}&
 -;_-* "-@_}A}
 -;_-* "ef-@_}A}
 -;_-* "�L-@_}A} 
 -;_-* "23-@_}A}'
 -;_-* "	-@_}A}
 -;_-* "ef	-@_}A}
 -;_-* "�L	-@_}A}!
 -;_-* "23	-@_�������������������
20% - Accent1�M��
20% - Accent1ef����%�
20% - Accent2�M�"�
20% - Accent2ef����%�
20% - Accent3�M�&�
20% - Accent3ef����%�
20% - Accent4�M�*�
20% - Accent4ef����%�
20% - Accent5�M�.�
20% - Accent5ef����%�
20% - Accent6�M�2�
20% - Accent6	ef����%�
40% - Accent1�M��
40% - Accent1�L����%�
40% - Accent2�M�#�
40% - Accent2�L渷��%�
40% - Accent3�M�'�
40% - Accent3�L���%�
40% - Accent4�M�+�
40% - Accent4�L���%�
40% - Accent5�M�/�
40% - Accent5�L����%�
40% - Accent6�M�3�
40% - Accent6	�L�մ��%�
60% - Accent1�M� �
60% - Accent123����%�
60% - Accent2�M�$�
60% - Accent223ږ���%�
60% - Accent3�M�(�
60% - Accent323�כ��%�
60% - Accent4�M�,�
60% - Accent423����%� 
60% - Accent5�M�0�
60% - Accent523����%�!
60% - Accent6�M�4�
60% - Accent6	23�����%�"Accent1�A��Accent1O�������%�#Accent2�A�!�Accent2�PM�����%�$Accent3�A�%�Accent3��Y�����%�%Accent4�A�)�Accent4�d������%�&Accent5�A�-�Accent5K������%�'Accent6�A�1�Accent6	��F�����%�(Bad�9��Bad�������%�)Calculation����Calculation������}�%������	���*
Check Cell���
Check Cell���������%�???��???��???�	�???��+��� ��Comma�,���(��	Comma [0]�-���&��Currency�.���.��Currency [0]�/Explanatory Text�G�5�Explanatory Text��%�0�	��K�	�Followed Hyperlink���%�	1Good�;��Good�����a�%�2	Heading 1�G��	Heading 1I}�%O����3	Heading 2�G��	Heading 2I}�%�?����4	Heading 3�G��	Heading 3I}�%23����5	Heading 4�9��	Heading 4I}�%�6���9��	Hyperlink
��%�
7Input�u��Input��̙��??v�%������	���8Linked Cell�K��Linked Cell��}�%�����9Neutral�A��Neutral�����W�%����3��Normal�%�	:Note�b�
�Note�������������������	������;Output�w��Output�����???�%�???��???��???�	�???��<���$��Percent�
=Title�1��TitleI}�%�
>Total�M��Total�%O���O����?Warning Text�?��Warning Text���%�X��TableStyleMedium2PivotStyleLight16`�$��First Submission Assessment �|�First Submission Score� �
Resubmission Assessment �r�Resubmission Score ��Final Score��RData Values�!HUStudents and Facilirators�_�Sheet3�����,��=�UsersZulchLAppDataLocalMicrosoftWindowsTemporary Internet FilesContent.OutlookGM7DPYVMM1.A02 Assignment Assessment Sheet Rev 0.xlsxFirst Submission Assessment First Submission ScoreResubmission Assessment Resubmission Score Final ScoreData ValuesStudents and FaciliratorsSheet3YYYYYYZ
NoYY,!
;Achieve:Achieved:!Content;No:!Notachieved:null: ;
 ;�� Status;YesNo;��5�fVf�@� @�������������Dw	

+	/��b�p�iJV�o�����]���n�p�iJV�o�����]��PNG


IHDR(-S`PLTE�����������wwwUUU���___̙3�̙�fffff��f��̙�̙���������������������̙�̙f��������e��tRNS������������������������������^bKGD�q�cmPPJCmp0712Hs��IDAT(SU��� 7H+���[��7
PZ剙lB@ڎ���zG����]��B��%f-�\[LE��I�s��'2b4%�(֖0r6����ax�ϋy�lN�u}D�^WE����.�'<�9���yˑ��/E#�*��qIEND�B`�b��~���BQ�SM,TF��<�n���~���BQ�SM,TF��PNG


IHDR���R0PLTE$�L�#�n�y��@��#�O����T8�	tRNS��������SOxbKGD�ޕzcmPPJCmp0712Om��/IDAT�c���$�%�``�2:$��@�� H,�3�R#��Sx.aϴƙIEND�B`�S���A�A�@�A@�
��  R)CommentStudent!Content/Understanding/ApplicationEvaluators Remarks StatusFacili-tatorAss No<Whole                                             AssignmentAssignment enhancements Score calculated by AlgorithmScore calculated by FormulaEval byRulingCommon problem areasDate EvaluatedDate ModeratedASubmission1Origiginal moderation Date	Ass Title  -Score if less than week lateFinal ScoreNERESUBMISSIONCeliaCraigIvorZulchYesNoESRNOriginal moderation Date1st submission Score Resubmission scoresMaraisLouisGMH Tswelelo	CCE000113louism@gmhcpp.comStudent AssignmentsStudent ActivitiesZacaAyandaSMEC South Africa	CCE000109ayanda.zaca@smec.comGerhardVermaakWSP / Parsons Brinkerhoff	CCE000118Gerhard.Vermaak@wspgroup.co.zaGraemeBaker&Henwood & Nxumalo Consulting Engineers	CCE000108graeme@hn.co.zaItaiGonese
IGS Engineers	CCE000115itai@igs.co.zaJaundre	DuvenhageDSV Consulting	CCE000112jaundre@dsv.co.zaLuxoloSindaneWSP|Parsons Brinkerhoff	CCE000114Luxolo.Sindane@wspgroup.co.zaCasperWasiefQunu Consulting Pty Ltd	CCE000117wasief@qunu.co.zaTyalimpiMonde	CCE000116monde.tyalimpi@smec.com	NkululekoMzulwini
Hatch Goba	CCE000120mzulwini@gmail.comPienaarPieterNyeleti	CCE000119pieterp@nyeleti.co.zaSechabaKouUWP Consulting	CCE000107sechabak@uwp.co.zaZumaTrevor(Mafahleni Engineers and Project Managers	CCE000111trevorz@mafahleni.co.zaDubeNkosiUClick on cells in columns E to I and Column K and select response from drop down list-G8To assess the resubmission right click and enter SaphireSub-mission no Facilitator
MathabathaSamkeMathethaTanyaMalulekeOriginal submission dateRe-submission dateFunekaMokwenaThaboNyaqelavan WijkHeinrich
TiroyaboneLeratoMoodleyNerissaPhumlaniGovenderRachaelRatlouSeaneLouwSilkeMabenaStheMandidiXolaniBelindaReshikaMothilalChikumbuSilenceSubmitted on timeMore than 7 days late&Satisfactory Language and presentation%Satisfactory content and undestandingExcellent workNeeds EnhancementResubmit> 1 week without permisionEXTENTION OF TIME -�Please remember to Provide Assignment Number in  Cell B1 and Assignment Title in G1-K1 before submitting for uploading on the CESANET.sASSESSMENT - Click on cells in columns H, I and J                     NOTE Column L will be filled in automatically'F'K#Please complete the data in Row 3. �Please complete the data in Row 3. The dates are used to determine if assignment was late or not. Use the date format as displayed.Question/Sub questionQuestion/Sub question 7Student submission Date (Over write black date if late)�Please remember to Complete Cell E3 before you start evaluating. The date are used to redetermine if assignment was late or not.iIf EoT is granted please complete columns F and G for that student only - The algorithm will do the rest.First Submission scoreSecond Submission scoreFINAL SCOREjTo assess this Assignment right click on this tab below and then  click on unprotect and then type Saphirec5oASSESSMENT - Click on cells in columns E to J                     NOTE Column L will be filled in automatically54&5B7G5Nico Geoff Billy Mike Celia 
Students 2020a. Excellent  :c. Enhancement: 
d. Resubmit :�FEEDBACK -- Allowance is made to give feedback to individual questions in Columns M to Z. Evaluator must type each question number in row 1 (red) and each question in row 2. Feedback will automatically be consolidated in column K.5	4�EXTENTION OF TIME -   If EoT is granted please complete columns F and G for that student only - The algorithms will do the rest.54
Resubmission Q ( E)excellent / (A)achieved /             (NE) Need Enhancement / ( R) Resubmit -,-,-/,B-G,b. Achieved : First Sub-mission
statusOriginal
 Submission 
StatusSubmitted
on   time
Yes/No*Submitted more than 
1 week late
 Yes /No ",Achieved - Understand/ Application
 E/A/NE/R#.# Good Language/ Presentation
Yes/No.. Good Effort / Originality / Innovation
Yes/No(.YESNO&Satisfactory Lanjuaje and presentation)Satisfactory Effort and Orijinal thinkinj%Satisfactory content and undestandinjQ2^Maintain Spread sheet 2020.05 as your Master Copy. Create copies to assess  your assignments .Submitted
on   time
Yes/No*Submitted more than 
1 week late
 Yes /No # Good Language/ Presentation
Yes/No=. Good Effort / Originality / Innovation
Yes/No(=$First Submission Assesment
 E/A/NE/R%Second Submission Assesment
 E/A/NE/RFirst Submission ScoreRESUBMISSION ASSESMENT-Achieved - UnderAtand / Application
 E/A/NE/RCompleted in 2019E DEFINITIONSThe students who put in a huge effort and answered all questions correctly and all others correctly should probably be awarded an E even if they made a small mistake (they are not lawyers and the comments will assist them in understanding where and why they made a mistake)The students who put in a good effort and answered all questions correctly and all others correctly should probably be awarded an A even if they made a small mistake (they are not lawyers and the comments will assist them in understanding where and why they made a mistake)sThe students who despite the effort answered more than one question incorrectly / partially should get R (resubmit)�The students who put in a good effort and answered all almost questions correctly  should probably be awarded an EN (the comments will assist them in understanding where and why they made mistakes))Whilst on site one of your colleagues, an electrical engineer, is asked by the contractor to give a decision which affects the foundations of the structure. Instead of consulting the specialists in your office your colleague gives a decision which proves to be incorrect. What is your firm s liability and what is your colleague s personal liability if any. Describe the basic elements of the laws of delict and contract, giving an explanation of the difference between liability in contract and liability in delict (if any) in respect of this incident.�Describe the differences between latent and patent defects, with 3 examples of each in relation to a Practical Completion inspection and a Final Completion inspectionAn acquaintance of yours asks you to design a rocket to fly to the moon, which you decide to accept. What if he had asked you to design a perpetual motion machine? Can there be a contract in both instances? List the requirements for the contract to be legally bindinghDraft a typical Professional Services Agreement (containing clause headings with brief summary only of the contents or purpose of the clause) for planning, design, and construction monitoring of a project related to your discipline of Engineering.  (Develop this as if applicable to the Heritage Project case study considering who your Employer is going to be)The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question mostly correctly and in good detail.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from < the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim based on pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV showsVery good and detailed answerYou have answered the question correctly. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible (fusion reactors are energy positive and there about four or five being built a.t.m. albeit still in the pilot/prototype phase). If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Desktop studies are frequently about impossible projects. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.   Good answerThe purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the first part of the question correctly and extensively but have been very short in considering the application of the principles to the real life situation depicted in the question.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer? Please enhance your answer.

Very good and detailed  answer�You have answered the first part of the question correctly and extensively but have been very short in considering the application of the principles to the real life situation depicted in the question. Copying or making use of someone else s design does not render a contract void. Designing a rocket to fly to the moon is possible if you have the necessary competencies so if you accept and cannot do it will place you in breach of contract but will not render the contract void.
The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics everything is possible. If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
The tests to determine if a contract is a valid contract are objective tests not subjective tests, being able to deliver is in itself not an objective test unless no one<   else can. Please enhance yoru answer      0Remember to read the questions carefully before answering them to ensure you answer what is being asked. Most of the questions are formulated to test understanding and not knowledge. I would recommend that you spend more time showing you have understood the principles as that is the aim of the questions�The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the first part of the question extensively but not necessarily correctly and have been very short in considering the application of the principles of contractual liability to the real life situation depicted in the question. Medical liability is a different field and one that is not relevant to the question asked.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just economic loss) and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer? Please enhance your answer.�Correct answer although it would be arguable whether a rusty pipe is a latent defect and not a design defect i.e. the incorrect material choice for the application.mYou are partly excused because you would not have studied physics at the level required to understand certain principles of physics but in traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is a physical impossibility i.e. you cannot build one that works. The inference being that if the contract to design a perpetual motion machine implied that it was incumbent on the designer to design a functioning one that could be built, then there would be no valid contract as performance is impossible. If the contract was simply to design one without the requirement that it could be built and work then there could be a valid  contract. Nowadays in the realm of quantum and fusion physics we might not be far from realising a perpetual motion machine but so far no one has been able to build one. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.Acceptable answerThe purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.
�Good answer. Bear in mind that some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period.�You have answered the question correctly. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible (fusion reactors are energy positive and there about four or five being built a.t.m. albeit still in the pilot/prototype phase). If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what deter<  mines their interpretation.   SYou have put a lot of research in your work which is gratifying to see. Keep it up.%The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have analysed the theory correctly but answered the question almost correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.
�Very good and very detailed answer. Some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period and other can remain latent and only manifest themselves later on..�Your answer is a bit short. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics everything is possible. If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Desktop studies frequently involve impossible projects however your Employer might have expected you to design a working machine. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.   Acceptable answer. FYou have done a lot of research on some of the questions, keep it up. �The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. 
Part of the answer is not correct.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost.  The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.  Please enhance your answer.�Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period. Acceptable answer. A contract for the design of a rocket does not have to be in writing, it can very well be a verbal agreement although proving terms and conditions will be a challenging exercise particularly if one party ends in breach of contract.
A contract to design a perpetual motion machine is not necessarily void, it is void if it is implied that the machine can be built and will generate perpetual motion using traditional physics (thermodynamics), if the contract is only to design one then it may just be a desk top study with no viable end result. If I am not mistaken in the realm of quantum mechanics and fusion physics a perpetual motion machine is a theoretical possibility and may also become reality maybe not in my life time but probabl<  y in yours. 
Very good and detailed answer.�I would suggest that you briefly revisit Hugh Lane s notes on delict and contract. Delict is not an easy principle to understand however it is an important principle to know. The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. Part of the answer is not correct particularly when you apply the theory to the example given. A valid contract also requires to be lawful and for performance to be possible,
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost.  The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows. Please enhance yoru answer.
$Correct answer although it would be arguable whether an undersized cable is a latent defect and not a design defect i.e. the incorrect cable size for the application. Bear in mind that some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period.�Correct answer. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible (fusion reactors are energy positive and there about four or five being built a.t.m. albeit still in the pilot/prototype phase). If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term; desktop studies frequently are about impossible projects. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation. $Please always quote your references.
The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question extensively on delictual liability but partly correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows
�Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that a latent defect at Practical Completion can become a patent defect during the defects or guarantee period. 7Very good answer. The tests to determine if a contract is a valid contract are objective tests not subjective tests. The answer to the question can you < design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
Very good answer7You have answered the question correctly. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics everything is possible. If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.�Generally a good assignment. Remember to read the questions carefully before answering them to ensure you answer what is being asked.Achieved last yearORemember to read the questions and ensure that they are the same as last year sUYour answer is confusing and confused. Please resubmit.
The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
�Please resubmit your answer in the context of the requirements for a contract to be valid. A specification is not one of them nor is for it to be in writing or signed. List the requirements for a valid contract first then look at what your friend asked you to perform and determine whether there is a valid contract or not. The tests to determine if a contract is a valid contract are objective tests not subjective tests, being able to deliver is in itself not an objective test unless no one else can.  Acceptable answer �Read the questions carefully before your answer them. Brain storm the content and then check that it answers the question asked  �The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly but have not assigned liability nor connected liability between parties i.e. the theoretical analysis is correct but the practical application is incomplete.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can b< e claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows�Very good answer. Whilst it is the Contractor s duty to rectify patent defects and latent defects during the latent defects liability period, the Engineer has a duty to detect patent defects as is reasonably possible and ensure that when Final Completion or Final Acceptance is certified there are none left that have not been rectified as some standard form contract expressly state that when the Engineer issues the Final Certificate, the Engineer certifies that all patent defects have been rectified.�Good detailed answer. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.�Very good answer. 
The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation. �The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly but have not assigned the liability i.e. who is the Consulting Engineer and who is you colleague liable to (if he is liable at all).
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in troub<  le with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim based on pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV showsVery good answer.�Good answer. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.XThe purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have understood the difference and have answered the question almost correctly.
The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.bAcceptable answer. Bear in mind that a latent defect at Practical Completion can become a patent defect during the defects or guarantee period. Usually there is a contractually defined period for the contractor s liability for latent defects, where it is not specified and has not been excluded the contractor s liability lasts for the life of the works.�Acceptable answer. 
The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. The wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Very good answer. You are the only one who has considered the content of your agreement i.e. you can design an impossible machine, building one is a different story altogether applying traditional physics, however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible.Very good answer .The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. Part of the answer is not correct particularly when you apply the theory to the example given.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost.  The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows. Please enhance your answer.�Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that a latent defect at Practical Completion can become a patent defect during the defects or guarantee period./Very good answer. You are the only one who has considered the content of your agreement i.e. you can design an impossible machine, building one is a different story altogether applying traditional physics, however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics e<  verything and anything is possible.Very good and extensive answerxIt is a pity that you answered the first question mostly incorrectly as you put a very good effort into this assignment.M3.A01,A Basic understanding of South African Law  MichaelQ1.1Q1.2Q1.3Comments�	Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question mostly correctly and in good detail.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim based on pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows
Q1.2    Very good and detailed answer
Q1.3    You have answered the question correctly. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible (fusion reactors are energy positive and there about four or five being built a.t.m. albeit still in the pilot/prototype phase). If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Desktop studies are frequently about impossible projects. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.   
Q2    Good answer
Comments    
    
   WQ1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the first part of the question correctly and extensively but have been very short in considering the application of the principles to the real life situation depicted in the question.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer? Please enhance your answer.


Q1.2    Very good and detailed  answer
Q1.3    You have answered the first part of the question correctly and extensively but have been very short in considering the application of the principles to the real life situation depi<  cted in the question. Copying or making use of someone else s design does not render a contract void. Designing a rocket to fly to the moon is possible if you have the necessary competencies so if you accept and cannot do it will place you in breach of contract but will not render the contract void.
The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics everything is possible. If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
The tests to determine if a contract is a valid contract are objective tests not subjective tests, being able to deliver is in itself not an objective test unless no one else can. Please enhance yoru answer      
Q2    Good answer
Comments    Remember to read the questions carefully before answering them to ensure you answer what is being asked. Most of the questions are formulated to test understanding and not knowledge. I would recommend that you spend more time showing you have understood the principles as that is the aim of the questions
    
   �	Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the first part of the question extensively but not necessarily correctly and have been very short in considering the application of the principles of contractual liability to the real life situation depicted in the question. Medical liability is a different field and one that is not relevant to the question asked.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just economic loss) and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer? Please enhance your answer.
Q1.2    Correct answer although it would be arguable whether a rusty pipe is a latent defect and not a design defect i.e. the incorrect material choice for the application.
Q1.3    You are partly excused because you would not have studied physics at the level required to understand certain principles of physics but in traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is a physical impossibility i.e. you cannot build one that works. The inference being that if the contract to design a perpetual motion machine implied that it was incumbent on the designer to design a functioning one that could be built, then there would be no valid contract as performance is impossible. If the contract was simply to design one without the requirement that it could be built and work then there could be a valid  contract. Nowadays in the realm of quantum and fusion physics we might not be far from realising a perpetual motion machine but so far no one has been able to build one. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Q2    Acceptable answer
Comments    
    
   
Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employ<  er. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.

Q1.2    Good answer. Bear in mind that some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period.
Q1.3    You have answered the question correctly. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible (fusion reactors are energy positive and there about four or five being built a.t.m. albeit still in the pilot/prototype phase). If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.   
Q2    Acceptable answer. 
Comments    You have put a lot of research in your work which is gratifying to see. Keep it up.
    
   A
Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have analysed the theory correctly but answered the question almost correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.

Q1.2    Very good and very detailed answer. Some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period and other can remain latent and only manifest themselves later on..
Q1.3    Your answer is a bit short. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual mo< tion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics everything is possible. If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Desktop studies frequently involve impossible projects however your Employer might have expected you to design a working machine. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.   
Q2    Very good and detailed answer.
Comments    You have done a lot of research on some of the questions, keep it up. 
    
   �
Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. 
Part of the answer is not correct.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost.  The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.  Please enhance your answer.
Q1.2    Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period. 
Q1.3    Acceptable answer. A contract for the design of a rocket does not have to be in writing, it can very well be a verbal agreement although proving terms and conditions will be a challenging exercise particularly if one party ends in breach of contract.
A contract to design a perpetual motion machine is not necessarily void, it is void if it is implied that the machine can be built and will generate perpetual motion using traditional physics (thermodynamics), if the contract is only to design one then it may just be a desk top study with no viable end result. If I am not mistaken in the realm of quantum mechanics and fusion physics a perpetual motion machine is a theoretical possibility and may also become reality maybe not in my life time but probably in yours. 

Q2    Very good and detailed answer.
Comments    I would suggest that you briefly revisit Hugh Lane s notes on delict and contract. Delict is not an easy principle to understand however it is an important principle to know. 
    
   Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. Part of the answer is not correct particularly when you apply the theory to the example given. A valid contract also requires to be lawful and for performance to be possible,
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost.  The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engin< eer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows. Please enhance yoru answer.

Q1.2    Correct answer although it would be arguable whether an undersized cable is a latent defect and not a design defect i.e. the incorrect cable size for the application. Bear in mind that some defects can be latent at PC inspection but become patent in the guarantee period or the defect period.
Q1.3    Correct answer. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible (fusion reactors are energy positive and there about four or five being built a.t.m. albeit still in the pilot/prototype phase). If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term; desktop studies frequently are about impossible projects. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation. 
Q2    Good answer
Comments    Please always quote your references.
    
   
Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question extensively on delictual liability but partly correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows

Q1.2    Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that a latent defect at Practical Completion can become a patent defect during the defects or guarantee period. 
Q1.3    Very good answer. The tests to determine if a contract is a valid contract are objective tests not subjective tests. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Q2    Good answer
Comments    
    
   +Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what<   he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?

Q1.2    Very good answer
Q1.3    You have answered the question correctly. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work although in the field of quantum mechanics everything is possible. If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Q2    Good answer
Comments    Generally a good assignment. Remember to read the questions carefully before answering them to ensure you answer what is being asked.
    
   �Q1.1    Achieved last year
Q1.2    Achieved last year
Q1.3    Achieved last year
Q2    Achieved last year
Comments    Remember to read the questions and ensure that they are the same as last year s
    
   (Q1.1    Your answer is confusing and confused. Please resubmit.
The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?

Q1.2    Very good answer
Q1.3    Please resubmit your answer in the context of the requirements for a contract to be valid. A specification is not one of them nor is for it to be in writing or signed. List the requirements for a valid contract first then look at what your friend asked you to perform and determine whether there is a valid contract or not. The tests to determine if a contract is a valid contract are objective tests not subjective tests, being able to deliver is in itself not an objective test unless no one else can.  
Q2    Acceptable answer 
Comments    Read the questions carefully before your answer them. Brain storm the content and then check that it answers the question asked  
    
   �Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly but have not assigned liability nor connected liability between parties i.e. the theoretical analysis is correct but the practical application is incomplete.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example <  think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows
Q1.2    Very good answer. Whilst it is the Contractor s duty to rectify patent defects and latent defects during the latent defects liability period, the Engineer has a duty to detect patent defects as is reasonably possible and ensure that when Final Completion or Final Acceptance is certified there are none left that have not been rectified as some standard form contract expressly state that when the Engineer issues the Final Certificate, the Engineer certifies that all patent defects have been rectified.
Q1.3    Good detailed answer. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Q2    Very good and detailed answer
Comments    
    
   *	Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.
Q1.2    Very good answer
Q1.3    Very good answer. 
The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation. 
Q2    Good answer
Comments    
    
   �	Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have answered the question almost correctly but have not assigned the liability i.e. who is the Consulting Engineer and who is you colleague liable to (if he is liable at all).
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would norma<  lly claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim based on pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows
Q1.2    Very good answer.
Q1.3    Good answer. The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. Be mindful that wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Q2    Good answer
Comments    
    
   �
Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. You have understood the difference and have answered the question almost correctly.
The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss (not just pure economic loss)  and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows.
Q1.2    Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that a latent defect at Practical Completion can become a patent defect during the defects or guarantee period. Usually there is a contractually defined period for the contractor s liability for latent defects, where it is not specified and has not been excluded the contractor s liability lasts for the life of the works.
Q1.3    Acceptable answer. 
The answer to the question can you design a perpetual motion machine, is probably yes but not necessarily one that would work (desk top studies are frequently about impossible designs). In the field of traditional physics a perpetual motion machine is an impossible machine however in the field of quantum mechanics<O and fusion physics everything and anything is possible. 
If buildability of the perpetual motion machine was not an express requirement and can be deemed to be an implied term of the contract then there is no contract if a working machine cannot be built, but only if buildability was an implied term. The wording in contracts is frequently what determines their interpretation.
Very good answer. You are the only one who has considered the content of your agreement i.e. you can design an impossible machine, building one is a different story altogether applying traditional physics, however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible.
Q2    Very good answer 
Comments    
    
   �Q1.1    The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer. Part of the answer is not correct particularly when you apply the theory to the example given.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost.  The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?
A delictual claim for pure economic loss is unlikely to succeed as our courts have shied away from awarding damages for pure economic loss and for good reason; as an example think of a person who provides financial advice in a newspaper or the radio or even on social media, if pure economic loss were a cause for action there would be an endless stream of law suits against guests who appear on TV shows. Please enhance your answer.
Q1.2    Acceptable answer. Bear in mind that a latent defect at Practical Completion can become a patent defect during the defects or guarantee period.
Q1.3    Very good answer. You are the only one who has considered the content of your agreement i.e. you can design an impossible machine, building one is a different story altogether applying traditional physics, however in the field of quantum mechanics and fusion physics everything and anything is possible.
Q2    Very good and extensive answer
Comments    It is a pity that you answered the first question mostly incorrectly as you put a very good effort into this assignment.
    
   �2��F����_^�����u���|�����b�����]O����V��;0�������>%����o	��c��
��)i�������_��O�	+K
�K�
�_� ��
i�*����(��-f����cc��B�����
	ZO��5z�*�.
d����MbP?_*+��%����&�\.����?'()M�Canon MB5100 series Printer
��߁h�d��A3�BJDM
�
��t�,T\q�,T\q�Rt,TT�`O�p,TT�,TT�`O�pXXDRAFTSample 1'	tRFRt	Rt�@��
��Rt��
��dCanon MB5100 series Printer
��߁h�d��A3u:YU�"?XX
�B�P(�?
�B�P(�?�&�\(U}�}�}�
}m}I}m	}}	�}

�L}	}�/}

}I+}�	}�%}�
}+}m
}$+}m	}�-}I}�-}�	}$	5��D ��D ��p!��;!�(��(p�(�(�(	�(
���
���������,����!I�!��1�@ hhhh�@w �
��
���
��
���
���
���

,�
���
,�
���
,�
���
,��
���
��
��,�
����,���ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp��
��
��
��
�s�
�tq�
��
��
��
����
����
��������������ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp��
�~
���@���@~�@���@r�
�
�
s�
�
��
���
���
���
���
���
�������
<m�
��
�l�
���
���
���
���
���
	���

=h�

�
�
�
���
���
���
�������
%��
&3�
'��/�?0@~�@�
1��
1��
t�
t�
	��

�i�
��
��
���
����
��� �������......�
%��
)v�
*w�2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�i�
��
��
����
����
����
��������......�
%��
)x�
*u�2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	t�

�i�
��
��
����
����
��� �������......�
%��
)y�
*z�2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�i�
��
��
����
����
����
��������......�
%��
){�
*|�2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�i�
��
��
����
����
����
��������......�
	%��
	)}�
	*~�	2�?3@~�@�
	4��
	4��
	t�
	t�
		��
	
�	i�
	��	
��
	��	��
	��	��
	��	��
	���	�����......�

%��

)c�

*�
2�?3@~�@�

4��

4��

t�

t�

	��


�
i�

��

��

��
��

��
��

��
��

���
�����.-----�
%��
)��
*��2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

� i�
��
��
����
����
��� �������.-----�
%��
)��
*��2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�!i�
��
��
����
����
����
��������.-----�

%��

)p�

*o�
2�?3@~�@�

4��

4��

t�

t�

	��


�"
i�

��

��

��
��

��
��

��
��

���
�����.-----�
%��
)��
*��2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t!�
t�
	��

�#i�
��
��
����
����
����
�������.-----�
%��
)��
*��2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�$i�
�
��
���
���
��� �������.-----�
%��
)��
*��2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�%i�
�
��
����
���
��� �������.-----�
%��
)��
*��2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�&i�
�
��
���
���
��� �������.-----�
%��
)r�
*q�2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��tt�	�

���0:��������������.-----�
%��
)n�
*d�2�?3@~�@�
4��
4��
t�
t�
	��

�'i�
�	
��
�
��
���
�� �������.-----�
%��
)��
*��5�?6@~�@�
7��
7��
u�
u�
	��

�(i�
�

��
���
���
���
�������.-----�
�
�
���
����������j��
��(����������k�����
����������l
�
����������m$�
��n#�
	��






m#�
	��






m#�
����������o�
��
n�@�"D��$P,,,,,,,,�,,<2422( 
,!
,"
w#
; $
w%
w&
w'
w(
w)
w*
w+
w,
w-
w.
w/
w0
w1
w2
w3
w4
�  �
  �
!�~
!@!�
"�~
"@"�
"��	�
#�~
#@#�
$�~
$�?$�
$��	�%t��	&�&t��	'�'t��	�(t��	�)t��	�*t��	�+t��	�,t��	�-t��	�.t��	�/t��	�0t��	�1t��	�2t��	�3t��	�4u��	�.��"&4&4���M�1	�L�(	�
��z�
��
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 1View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=211yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`������
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 2���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=211yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`������
��
��`��A?��?�����
Picture 3���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=211yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`�����z�
��
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 4View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=200yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`������
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 5���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=200yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`������
��
��`��A?��?�����
Picture 6���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=200yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`�����z�
��
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 7View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=199yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`������
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 8���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=199yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`������
��
��`��A?��?�����
Picture 9���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=199yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`�����|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 10View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=201yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`������
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 11���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=201yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`������
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 12���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=201yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`�����|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 13View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=206yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`������
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 14���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=206yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`������
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 15���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=206yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`�����|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 16View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=198yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`������
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 17���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=198yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`������
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 18���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=198yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`�����|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 19View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=205yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 20���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=205yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 21���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=205yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`��<��|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 22View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=202yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 23���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=202yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 24���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=202yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`��<��|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 25View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=210yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 26���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=210yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 27���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=210yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`��<��|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 28View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=182yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 29���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=182yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 30���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=182yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`��<��|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 31View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=196yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 32���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=196yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 33���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=196yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`��<��|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 34View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=212yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 35���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=212yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
��
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 36���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=212yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&�`��<��|�
��
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 37View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=204yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&�`��<���
��
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 38���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=204yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&�`��<���
�
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 39���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=204yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&`��<��|�
�
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 40View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=189yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&`��<���
�
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 41���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=189yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&`��<���
�
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 42���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=189yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&`��<��|�
�
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 43View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=181yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&`��<���
�
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 44���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=181yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&`��<���
�
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 45���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=181yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&`��<��|�
�
��B��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 46View���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=197yX��;H�,�]ą'c���
 
� ��]&`��<���
�
��d��A?��?�����
Picture 47���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=197yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� 6 ��]&`��<���
�	
��b��A?��?�����
Picture 48���y������K����y������K��https://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=197yX��;H�,�]ą'c��� � ��]&	`��>�@d��A
����$	���































				



















		
								
����;���$D$3����;���$D$3����;���$D$3{U{&��;��������\*x}{U{&��;��������\*x}{U{&��;��������\*x}������9�EANERE%4�/�	YesNoN	�	Sheet1gg����D
	ZO����t�
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�"	dXX333333�?333333�?�&�<3U}�
C}$
C}IC}�C}C}�C}�
C}C}		$C}

mC}�	}$	}$	}�����C �Y�C ��@ ��@ �J�F�@�@�,@�,�C	�,@
�@�@�@
�@�,@�,@!,�C!,�C!,�C!;�C!,�C!,�C !,�C !, �JIHHHXHHHHi
�J		HHXHHHH	�

l�+]PPPPPPPPPPL�� �Z�
Eval by> �� �Z�
Michael�a�� 	�Z�Original submission date>@~�@�Z���� �Z�Date Evaluated>��@�Z��
�#��Z�������
��

K
~
E�?E�0E�?E�?E@E@E�E�E��
��

��� �Z�Sub-mission no �m�� �Z�Submitted
on   time
Yes/No�i�� �Z�-*Submitted more than 
1 week late
 Yes /No �i�� �Z�0-Achieved - UnderAtand / Application
 E/A/NE/R�e�� �Z�&# Good Language/ Presentation
Yes/No�d�� �Z	�1. Good Effort / Originality / Innovation
Yes/No�
	9��

�	�
�	�
�	�

�	�
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
�
U$��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�
Vermaak�a�� �Z�
Belinda��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� 	�Z�E��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� ��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BEx
�$@�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX�$@
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B�$@��KAL�	,L��NE	,�,�"B
�$@�
�^

TL��R*=L�L�L�L�L�L�L�L�L	�B��?��H>L��Yes#L��
"
B���?����L��A&L��Yes
"�L��E&L��Yes
"GL��NE&L��Yes
"
""B��?����L��A,L��Yes
�?
"�L��E,L��Yes
�?
"ML��NE,L��Yes
�?
"
""B�@��wmL��A
@QL��E
@.L��NE
@
""B�@��* L�E
B���1'L�NE
�
B���0&L�R
�
B�
��2(L�Yes
�
B�GGGG��(��L�
Belindao$@��L��GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG���� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�
Mokwena�e�� �Z�Thabo��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� 	�Z�NE��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� ��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BNEx
�@�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX�@
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B�@�
�@�
��?����?���?��@�����
��
��
�G��(�Thaboo@���� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�
Nyaqela�e�� �Z�	Funeka��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�NE��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BNEx
�@	�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX�@
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B�@�
�@�
��?����?���?��@��
���������CCCG��(�	Funekao@��CCCCCC!��� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�van Wijk�W�� �Z�Heinrich��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�E��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BEx
�$@�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX�$@
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B�$@�
�$@
�
��?����?���?��@��@������
��CCCG��(�Heinricho$@
��CCCCCC!��� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�

Tiroyabone�y�� 	�Z�	Lerato��?	�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�A��� �Z�Yes��� 	�Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BAx
� @�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX� @
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B� @�
� @�
��?����?���?��@��	������
�G��(�	Leratoo @�	��� 	�Z	�	Billy 	�y�� 	�Z	�
Moodley	�l�� 
�Z	�
Nerissa	��?		�Z	�	��� �Z	�YES	��� �Z	�NO	��� 	�Z	�NE	��� 	�Z	�Yes	��� 
�Z		�Yes�		��� 
��Z	�NE	NEkZ	�RRKZ	�EE+Z	�AA """BNEx	
�@�bD		�A	$	�JD		�NE	$	�*D		�E	$	�*""BX	�@	
�BD	�-Z	�yes$	�"B	�@	�	
�@�
	��?	�	�	��?	�	��?�	�@
�	�	�	��
�	�	�	���	CCC	G��(�
Nerissa	o@��	CCCCCC!
��� 
�Z
�Nico 
� �� 
�Z
�Zuma
� �� �Z
�Phumlani
��?
	�Z
�
��� 
�Z
�YES
��� 	�Z
�NO
��� 
�Z
�NE
��� 
�Z
�Yes
��� �Z
	�Yes�
	��� ��Z
�NE	NEkZ
�RRKZ
�EE+Z
�AA """BNEx

�@�bD
	�A	$
�JD
	�NE	$
�*D
	�E	$
�*""BX
�@

�BD
�-Z
�yes$
�"B
�@
�

�@

�

��?�
�
��?�
��?
�
�@�
��
���
��
�
��
CCC
G��(�Phumlani
o@��
CCCCCC!��� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�Govender�n�� �Z�
Rachael��?	�Z���� 
�Z�YES��� 	�Z�NO��� �Z�A��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� ��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BAx
� @
�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX� @
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B� @�
� @
�
��?	����?���?��@��������
��CCCG��(�
Rachaelo @	��CCCCCC!��� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�Mothilal�i�� 
�Z�
Reshika��?
�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�A��� �Z�Yes��� 
�Z	�Yes�	��� 
	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BA
� @�
�l

bL��A	,�JL��NE	,�*L��E	,�*""BX� @
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B� @�
� @
�
��?����?���?��@����������CCCG��(�
Reshikao @��CCCCCC!
��� 
�Z
�	Celia 
�a�� 
�Z
�Mathetha
�e�� �Z
�Samke
��?�Z
�
��� 
�Z
�YES
��� 
�Z
�NO
��� 
�Z
�A
��� 
�Z
�Yes
��� �Z
	�Yes�
	��� 	��Z
�NE	NEkZ
�RRKZ
�EE+Z
�AA """BA

� @�
X
� @

�BD
�-Z
�yes$
�"B
� @
�

� @
�

��?�
�
��?
�
��?	�
�@
�
��
��
��
�
��
CCC
G��(	�Samke
o @��
CCCCCC!��� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�	Ratlou�o�� �Z�Seane��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�R��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BR
���(�
*X��� 
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B*���(�*
���(
�
*��?
�����������
�������CCCG��(�Seaneoe��(�*�CCCCCC!��� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�Chikumbu�u�� �Z�
Silence��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�A��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BA
� @
�
X� @
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B� @�
� @�
��?����?���?��@��������
��CCCG��(�
Silenceo @
��CCCCCC!��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�Louw�f�� �Z�Silke��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�E��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BE
�$@�
X�$@
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B�$@�
�$@
�
��?����?���?��@��@�������G��(�Silkeo$@���� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�	Mabena�n�� �Z�Sthe��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�A��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� ��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BA
� @�
X� @
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B� @�
� @

�
��?����?���?
��@��
����	���G��(
�Stheo @���� �Z�	Celia �a�� �Z�Maluleke�l�� �Z�Tanya������Z���Z���Z	��	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """B 
�X��BD�-Z�yes$�"B��
��
��������
���������G��(
�Tanyao���� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�

Mathabatha�a�� �Z�	Trevor��?
�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�A��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BAx
� @�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX� @
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B� @�
� @�
��?����?���?��@��������
�G��(�	Trevoro @���� 	
�Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�
Mandidi�i�� �Z�	Xolani��?�Z���� �Z�YES��� �Z�NO��� �Z�NE��� �Z�Yes��� �Z	�Yes�	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """BNEx
�@�bD	�A	$�JD	�NE	$�*D	�E	$�*""BX�@
�BD�-Z�yes$�"B�@�
�@�
��?����?���?��@���������
�G��(�	Xolanio@�����\�����\�����\�����\����\����\��Z���Z���Z	��	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """B 9
��� �#D	�A	**B*7���(
�!D�	$�Bw��� �aD
�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�JEJEJZJAJ	JJ 7
����!\
�D
B=����'\D�B@����*\Yes�B��@
��D	�A,D�Yes
�?
"�D	�E,D�Yes
�?
"MD	�NE,D�Yes
�?
"
""B8����"\��E
B@����*\ASNE
�
B?����)\ANE
�
B>����(\R
�
B8����"\R
BG���D�o�� �D
�*����\
�����\
�����\�V���\V���\h���\��Z���Z���Z	��	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """B 9
��� �#D	�A	**B*7\��(
�!D�	$�Bw\�� �aD
�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�JEJEJZJAJ	JJ 7
W���!\
�D
B=W���'\D�B@W���*\Yes�B��@
��D	�A,D�Yes
�?
"�D	�E,D�Yes
�?
"MD	�NE,D�Yes
�?
"
""B8W���"\E
B@W���*\SNE
�
B?W���)\NE
�
B>W���(\R
�
B8W���"\R
BG���D�o�� �D
�*����\
�����\
�����\�V���\V���\h���\��Z���Z���Z	��	��� 	��Z�NE	NEkZ�RRKZ�EE+Z�AA """B 9
��� �#D	�A	**B*7\��(
�!D�	$�Bw\�� �aD
�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�D�JEJEJZJAJ	JJ 7
W���!\
�D
B=W���'\D�B@W���*\Yes�B��@
��D	�A,D�Yes
�?
"�D	�E,D�Yes
�?
"MD	�NE,D�Yes
�?
"
""B8W���"\E
B@W���*\SNE
�
B?W���)\NE
�
B>W���(\R
�
B8W���"\R
B�CCCG���D�o�� �D
�*�CCCCCC �4�i� N��z	��������SyV))�������	C	C		
			�	
	
Ye	

		D	,	Yes				

			
	

					
		
	
						
					
		
			
												
						
					

	

	

	


		

				
			
	

				
			
	

	

	

	


		

	


						

					

						
		
		
		

			
					
								
			
	
				
			
								��� ���(	�
��n�
�
c�4��N����Chart 1� �s�]@	 ZO��PPPZaajk����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�"@XX333333�?333333�?3�&�<3�P�Hp�<�0�(	�
�<k�M3�d23�����
���	MRR
RR��I�3~SS43Q:
.1st submission Score Q�;Q;Q��3_��M
ff����6	f����O������������������������������������@��"�B����������� ������������� �������������`	MM<RRRR�����8�]hSS4ESS4D$% ������03O&RQRR�������SS4$% �������3O&RQ4FAI��
�3Oo&F3 b�RRRRVVd-&R!���������u��,���O���
Ia.�(�IaQRSS43* &R!�����!�����RR���u��,���u��,��-$͒SS4523��M
���	MRR��͒n]�SS43�"
4SS4�D�o&F% A�
3O��������+&SQ23��M
���NMRRRR��͒�]�SS4'�<�0���(\���
Ia/SS4��-$͒��
Ia[SS
4eee�*�Iaven-US��Ib%
>�@K͒��ʒ���	Sheet2gg����
	ZO��$�sy�z
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&��j�Z��?'��j�Z��?(��~����?)��~����?M�Canon MB5100 series Printer (C
��߁	�4d��A4�BJDM
�
��Rt,T`O�p,T`O�pRt,TT�`O�p,TT�,TT�`O�pXXDRAFTSample 1'		d	Rt	Rt�@
��
��Rt��
��dCanon MB5100 series Printer (C
��߁	�4d��A4�8?�"	RX,
�B�P(�?
�B�P(�?�&�\(U}�	�}IC}�C}I�}$�}I�}��}�
�}		m
�}

C�}��}�/�}

�}I+�}�	�}�%�}�
�}+�}m
�}$+�}m	�}�-�}I�}�-�}�	�}$	�}$	@$��D ��� ��A �B ��b��b��b��c��c	��c
��d��d��e
��e��e��e��e��e��e��d��e ��G J�G0wwwww� X@X@X@�
��� �Z�	M3.A01
�
�
��� 
�Z�/,A Basic understanding of South African Law  ��
�
B�� 
�Z
�Q1.1�
 �B�� 
�Z�Q1.2�
 �B�� �Z�Q1.3�
 �B�� �Z�Q2�
 �B�� �Z�Comments�
 �B�Z��
 �B�Z���AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA��
@�
��
��
?s�
?tA�
��
��
��
����
����
��������������pppppppppppppppCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC���� �Z�
Eval by� �� �Z�
Michael~
��w�@�
�~
�v�@�
�
�
!�
�
��
���
���
���
���
���
��,����ppppppppppppppp+�
��

�
���
���
���
���
���
���
	���

�
"��

�
�
�
���
���
���
��,����;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;+��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�
Vermaak�a�� �Z�
Belinda��n�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*Y�n��(�CD�NE	$@*D�R	$@*"B*^�n��(	�HD�**1D�D@

YESNO"B*_�n��(�ID�**2D�D@

YESNO"B*��n��(�kD�**TD�NE	 E/A/NE/R-D�

ASSESS*""B*y�n��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*y	�n��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*
�n�� 
�*�n��(����L��**�L��EEgL��AAIL��RR+L��NE	NE """"B*�
��
��
���
����
���8�������..................+��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�
Mokwena�e�� �Z�Thabo��o�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BNEY��v�@�CD�NE	$@*D�R	$@*"B^���(�HD�**1D�D@

YESNO"BYES_���(	�ID�**2D�D@

YESNO"BNO����(�kD�**TD�NE	 E/A/NE/R-D�

ASSESS*""B	 E/A/NE/Ry�/��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*y	�/��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*
�/�� �Feedback�b��(� �
��
��
����
����
����
���4�����..................+��� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�
Nyaqela�e�� �Z�	Funeka��k�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BNEY��v�@�CD�NE	$@*D�R	$@*"B^���(�HD�**1D�D@

YESNO"BYES_���(�ID�**2D�D@

YESNO"BNO����(�kD�**TD�NE	 E/A/NE/R-D�

ASSESS*""B	 E/A/NE/Ry�/��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*y	�/��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*
�/�� 
�Feedback�b��(	� �
��
��
����
����
���8�������..................+��� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�van Wijk�W�� �Z�Heinrich��r�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*Y�r��(�CD�NE	$@*D�R	$@*"B*^�r��(�HD�**1D�D@

YESNO"B*_�r��(	�ID�**2D�D@

YESNO"B*��r��(�kD�**TD�NE	 E/A/NE/R-D�

ASSESS*""B*y�r��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*y	�r��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*
�r�� 
�*�r��(�*�
��
��
����
����
����
���4�����..................+��� �Z�Nico � �� 	�Z�

Tiroyabone�y�� �Z�	Lerato��t�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*Y�t��(�CD�NE	$@*D�R	$@*"B*^�t��(�HD�**1D�D@

YESNO"B*_�t��(�ID�**2D�D@

YESNO"B*��t��(	�kD�**TD�NE	 E/A/NE/R-D�

ASSESS*""B*y�t��(	�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*y	�t��(�cD�**LD�NE*-D�

ASSESS*""B*
�t�� 	
�*�t��(	�*�
��
��
����
����
����
���4�����..................+	��� 	�Z	�	Billy 	�y�� 
�Z	�
Moodley	�l�� �Z	�
Nerissa�	�s�� 
��Z		�NE	NElZ		�A*LZ		�E*,Z		� 	 *R"""BNE	��v�@	�	�M	CL��NE	,@*L��R	,@*"B	���(�	�R	HL��**1L��L�@

YESNO"BYES	���(	�	�S	IL��**2L��L�@

YESNO"BNO	���(	�	�u	kL��**TL��NE	 E/A/NE/R-L��

ASSESS*""B	 E/A/NE/R	�/��(		�	�m	cL��**LL��NE*-L��

ASSESS*""B*		���(
�		�m			cL��**LL��NE*-L��

ASSESS*""B*	
��� 

�Feedback	�b��(#� �
	��	
��
	��	��
	��	��
	��	��
	���4	�����..................+
��� 
�Z
�Nico 
� �� �Z
�Zuma
� �� �Z
�Phumlani�
�l�� ��Z
	�NE	NElZ
	�A*LZ
	�E*,Z
	� 	 *R"""BNE
��v�@
�	
���(
�	YES
���(	�	NO
���(
�		 E/A/NE/R
�/��(
	�	*
	�/��(
�		*

�/�� 
�Feedback
�b��(
� �

��

��

��
��

��
��

��
��

���4
�����.-----------------+��� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�Govender�n�� �Z�
Rachael��a�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*�a��(�	*�a��(�	*�a��(	�	*�a��(�	*�a��(�	*	�a��(�		*
�a�� 
�*�a��(�*�
��
��
����
����
���8�������.-----------------+��� �Z�Mike � �� 
�Z�Mothilal�i�� �Z�
Reshika��i�� 
��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*�i��(�	*�i��(�	*�i��(	�	*�i��(�	*�i��(�	*	�i��(�		*
�i�� 

�*�i��(�*�
��
��
����
����
����
���4�����.-----------------+
��� 
�Z
�	Celia 
�a�� �Z
�Mathetha
�e�� 	�Z
�Samke�
�e�� ��Z
	�NE	NElZ
	�A*LZ
	�E*,Z
	� 	 *R"""B*
�e��(
�	*
�e��(
�	*
�e��(�	*
�e��(
�	*
�e��(
	�	*
	�e��(�		*

�e�� 
�*
�e��(
�*�

��

��

��
��

��
��

��
��

���4
�����.-----------------+��� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�	Ratlou�o�� �Z�Seane��e�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BR��v�@�	���(
�	YES���(�	NO���(�		ASSESS�S��(�		ASSESS	�S��(�			ASSESS
�S�� �i
3Q1.1 -  Your answer is confusing and confused. Please resubmit.
The purpose of the question was for you to understand the difference between contractual and delictual liability applied to a Consulting Engineer.
There is no contractual relationship between the Engineer and the Contractor therefore the Contractor would normally claim only from the Employer. The Employer would claim from the Engineer s PI Insurers. The Contractor can only claim his loss and not more therefore the only instance in which the Contractor could (but unlikely) have a delictual claim against the Engineer would be if he has suffered physical loss and the amount that can be claimed from the Employer is less than what he has lost. The electrical engineer could be in trouble with his/her own employer but unlikely to be at risk of a claim against him/her. If third parties were injured or suffered physical loss then both the Consulting Engineer and the electrical engineer might be exposed to a delictual claim. If you look at the same situation would it have been any different if the decision had been given by a structural engineer?

Q1.2 -  Very good answer
Q1.3 -  5
Q2 -  Acceptable answer 
Comments -  Read the questions carefully before your answer them. Brain storm the content and then check that it answers the question asked  
0 -  
0 -  �.��(	� �
��
��
����
����
����
��4�����.-----------------+��� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�Chikumbu�u�� �Z�
Silence��n�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*	�n��(�		*
�n�� 
�*�n��(�*�
�
��
���
���
���8�������.-----------------+��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�Louw�f�� �Z�Silke��e�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*�e��(�	*�e��(	�	*�e��(�	*�e��(�	*�e��(	�	*	�e��(�		*
�e�� 
�*�e��(�*�
�
��
����
���
���8�������.-----------------+��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�	Mabena�n�� 
�Z�Sthe��n�� 	��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*�n��(�	*�n��(	�	*	�n��(
�		*
�n�� 
�*�n��(�*�
�
��
���
���
���8�������.-----------------+��� �Z�	Celia �a�� �Z�Maluleke�l�� 
�Z�Tanya��a�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B *�a��(�	*�a��(�	NO�a��(�	YES����	
��� 
�*���� �F��������������.-----------------+��� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�

Mathabatha�a�� �Z�	Trevor��o�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*�o��(�	*�o��(�	*�o��(	�	*�o��(�	*�o��(�	*	�o��(�		*
�o�� 
�*�o��(�*�
�	
��
�
��
���
��8�������.-----------------+��� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�
Mandidi�i�� �Z�	Xolani��n�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BNE��v�@�	���(�	YES���(�	NO���(�		 E/A/NE/R�/��(�	*	�/��(�		*
�/�� 
�Feedback�b��(� �
�

��
���
���
���
��4�����.-----------------+�

� gg����������������ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff��
�gg����������������ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff��
�k����������
�j����������
������������
������������
����
����������
������������
���
���
����
��
����
��
���D\l"��r����t�|
���R�((((<(B> ,#, ��
 �!�
 �� {#��� 	�eD	�**ND	�NE
MMM-D	�

ASSESS*""BMMM��>�8		�	*	N	E	-		

		SS	"		B		
	f	f	f	f		f
	f	
f	f	f	f		f		f	
f	f	f	f		f	
f			f			f		f
		f			
f

	f

	f
	f
	f

	
f	f	f	f	 E	
ee
	d 	Co	ct	he
		re	
 C

	ac

	wo	
	no
		ly

	
im	y 	 t	mp		r.	 E	ye	ul		ai	
om	 E	ee	PI		ur	
 T	on	to
	n 	
 c	 h	os
	d 		mo	
he	re	 o	in	ce		wh	
th	nt	or	ld		t 	
ke�P�H0�,�0�(	�
�,>�@F���
A
�$	���		


  





















		

		





		



		

		


		






������1�EANERE�L&DYes	##"�+#Y	�zTL��EL��SB%	#+L��R	##
""�L&L��Yes	##"�	Sheet3gg����D
	ZO����}�
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�"	dXX333333�?333333�?�&�<3U}$	C}�
C}�C}�
C}�C}�C}$
C}
IC}IC}mQ}

C}}$	C}$	C}$	C}}�@ }Y@ }g@ }�@ }J�F}J@}J@}J@}J@	}J@
}J@}J@}J@
}J@}J�G}J@"J@"J@"J@"J@"J@ ",` ",�F ", � JIOOOYOOOOaYZ�J		OOYOOOO	�

^�
$��%%%%%%%%L�� �Z�
Eval by! �� �Z�
Eval by!��� �Z�Date Evaluated� �� 
�Z�
MichaelR��� �Z�Date Moderated��w�@�Z��	��� �Z�	Ass No
�N�� 
�
!

�[��	M3.A01^ �
�___�$`�?`�?`@`@a��
T�
"#�
����� �Z�Submitted
on   time
Yes/No�i�� �Z�-*Submitted more than 
1 week late
 Yes /No �i�� �Z�0-Achieved - UnderAtand / Application
 E/A/NE/R�e�� �Z�&# Good Language/ Presentation
Yes/No�d�� �Z	�1. Good Effort / Originality / Innovation
Yes/No�
	��
X��	�Z
� Score calculated by Algorithm�
d	�
�	�

�	�
v��
\��
]��
]��
]��
���
C�
U%��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�
Vermaak�a�� �Z�
BelindaSn�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� 	�Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z	�*	Tn�� �Z�*[
}n��(
�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��n�� ��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*9[n��(
�#D�**$
�B*�
wn�� ��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*�Wn�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*ryn��(�\D�**ED	�0(D�No
""B*�W��D�A&D�Yes
"dD�E&D�Yes
"(D�NE
""BqW�[D�AED�E(D�NE
""B6W� D�E
BY��2(L�Yes
�
B�
��(��L�
BelindaGn��(
��L�*��GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG|��� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�
Mokwenae�� �Z�Thabo�o�� �Z�NE�o�� �Z�YES�o�� �Z�NO�o�� �Z�	 E/A/NE/R�/�� �Z�*�/�� �Z	�*	O/�� �Z� [
~�ED�**.D�@$�"B��
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B9�@�#D�**$
�B�
�@��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B���� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BNEz�?��f\L�**EL��0(L��No
""B�����L��A&L��Yes
"dL��E&L��Yes
"(L��NE
""Bq�	�[D�AED�E(D�NE
""B���* L�E
B���
��(�ThaboG�� ��� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�
Nyaqelae�� �Z�	Funeka�k�� �Z�NE�k�� �Z�YES�k�� �Z�NO�k�� �Z�	 E/A/NE/R�/�� �Z�*�/�� 	�Z	�*	O/�� �Z� [
~

�ED�**.D�@$�"B����D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B9�@
�#D�**$
�B�
�@��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B���� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BNEz�?���q��[D�AED�E(D�NE
""B�����
��(�	FunekaG�� ��� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�van WijkW�� �Z�Heinrich�r�� 
�Z�*�r�� �Z�*�r�� �Z�*�r�� �Z�*�r�� �Z�*�r�� 	�Z	�*	Or�� �Z�*[
~r��(�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��r�� 
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*9�r��(
�#D�**$
�B*�
�r�� ��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��r�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*zr��(�*�����e[L��AEL��E(L��NE
""B�����
��(�HeinrichGr��(�*� ��� 	�Z�Nico � �� �Z�

Tiroyaboney�� �Z�	Lerato�t�� �Z�*�t�� �Z�*�t�� �Z�*�t�� �Z�*�t�� �Z�*�t�� 	�Z	�*	Ot�� 	�Z�*[
~t��(�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��t�� 
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*9�t��(
�#D�**$
�B*�
�t�� ��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��t�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*zt��(�*���������
��(	�	LeratoGt��(
�*� 	��� 	�Z	�	Billy 	�y�� 	�Z	�
Moodley	l�� 
�Z	�
Nerissa	�s�� �Z	�NE	�s�� 	�Z	�YES	�s�� 	�Z	�NO	�s�� �Z	�	 E/A/NE/R	�/�� 	�Z	�*	�/�� 
�Z		�*		O/�� 
	�Z	� [	
~

�ED	�**.D	�@$	�"B�	���D	�**kD		� NZ	�yes-Z	�yes$	�"""B	�@�	�-	#L��**,�B�	
�@
��D	�**D	�R"D	�D	�D	�D	�D	�GD	�NE:	
�%D	�D	�D	�D	�D	�""B�	��� ��Z		�NE	NElZ		�A*LZ		�E*,Z		� 	 *R"""BNE	z�?�	�	�	�	�	��	�	�	C��(
�
Nerissa	G�
��� 
�Z
�Nico 
� �� 
�Z
�Zuma
 �� �Z
�Phumlani
�l�� �Z
�NE
�l�� 
�Z
�YES
�l�� 
�Z
�NO
�l�� �Z
�	 E/A/NE/R
�/�� 
�Z
�*
�/�� �Z
	�*
	O/�� 	�Z
� [

~
�ED
�**.D
�@$
�"B�
���D
�**kD
	� NZ
�yes-Z
�yes$
�"""B
�@
�	�

�@
��D
�**D
�R"D
�D
�D
�D
�D
�GD
�NE:

�%D
�D
�D
�D
�D
�""B�
��� 	��Z
	�NE	NElZ
	�A*LZ
	�E*,Z
	� 	 *R"""BNE
z�?
�
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
C��(�Phumlani
G	���� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�Govendern�� �Z�
Rachael�a�� �Z�*�a�� �Z�*�a�� �Z�*�a�� �Z�*�a�� �Z�*�a�� �Z	�*	Oa�� 	�Z�*[
~a��(	
�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��a�� ��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*�a��(�	*�
�a�� 
��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��a�� 
��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*za��(�*�	�������C��(�
RachaelGa��(�*�a�� �Z�Mike � �� �Z�Mothilali�� 
�Z�
Reshika�i�� �Z�*�i�� �Z�*�i�� �Z�*�i�� �Z�*�i�� �Z�*�i�� 
�Z	�*	Oi�� 
	�Z�*[
~i��(
�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��i�� ��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*�i��(�	*�
�i�� 
��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��i�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*zi��(	�*��������C��(
�
ReshikaGi��(
�*
�i�� 
�Z
�	Celia 
�a�� 
�Z
�Mathetha
e�� �Z
�Samke
�e�� �Z
�*
�e�� 
�Z
�*
�e�� 
�Z
�*
�e�� 	�Z
�*
�e�� 
�Z
�*
�e�� �Z
	�*
	Oe�� 
�Z
�*[

~e��(
�ED
�**.D
�@$
�"B*�
�e�� ��D
�**kD
	� NZ
�yes-Z
�yes$
�"""B*
�e��(

�	*�

�e�� ��D
�**D
�R"D
�D
�D
�D
�D
�GD
�NE:

�%D
�D
�D
�D
�D
�""B*�
�e�� ��Z
	�NE	NElZ
	�A*LZ
	�E*,Z
	� 	 *R"""B*r
ze�� �\D
�**ED
	�0(D
�No
""B*�
�
��D
�A&D
�Yes
"dD
�E&D
�Yes
"(D
�NE
""B
�
�6
�� D
�E
B
�

�
C��(�Samke
Ge��(�*�e�� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�	Ratlouo�� �Z�Seane�e�� 
�Z�R�e�� �Z�YES�e�� �Z�NO�e�� �Z�	ASSESS�S�� �Z�	ASSESS�S�� 	�Z	�	ASSESS	OS�� �Z� [
~
�ED�**.D�@$�"B����D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B��?�	�
��?
��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B���� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BRz�?
��f\L�**EL��0(L��No
""B�
����L��A&L��Yes
"dL��E&L��Yes
"(L��NE
""B�����* L�E
B���
CCC��(�SeaneG��CCCCCCCCCCCC#��� �Z�Nico � �� �Z�Chikumbuu�� �Z�
Silence�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� 	�Z	�*	On�� �Z�*[
~n��(�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��n�� 
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*�n��(�	*�
�n�� ��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��n�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*zn��(�*��������C��(�
SilenceGn��(�*�n�� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�Louwf�� �Z�Silke�e�� �Z�*�e�� �Z�*�e�� �Z�*�e�� �Z�*�e�� �Z�*�e�� 	�Z	�*	Oe�� �Z�*[
~e��(
�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��e�� 
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*�e��(�	*�
�e�� 
��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��e�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*ze��(�*��������C��(�SilkeGe��(
�*�e�� �Z�	Geoff �f�� �Z�	Mabenan�� �Z�Sthe�n�� 	�Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� �Z�*�n�� 	�Z	�*	On�� �Z�*[
~n��(
�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��n�� ��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*�n��(�	*�
�n�� ��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��n�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*zn��(�*�������
�C��(�StheG��(�*��� �Z�	Celia �a�� �Z�Malulekel�� �Z�Tanya�a�� �Z� *�a�� �Z�NO�a�� �Z�YES�
�Z���Z��	�Z	�	O���Z� [
~
�ED�**.D�@$�"B����D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B���	�
����D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B���� 
��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B *z
����������C��(�TanyaG���� �Z�	Billy �y�� �Z�

Mathabathaa�� �Z�	Trevor�o�� 	�Z�*�o�� �Z�*�o�� �Z�*�o�� �Z�*�o�� �Z�*�o�� 	�Z	�*	Oo�� �Z�*[
~o��(
�ED�**.D�@$�"B*��o�� 
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""B*�o��(	�	*�
�o�� 
��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B*��o�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B*zo��(�*��������C��(�	TrevorGo��(
�*Uo�� �Z�	Billy Vy�� �Z�
MandidiWi�� �Z�	XolaniMn�� �Z�NEPn�� �Z�YESPn�� �Z�NOPn�� �Z�	 E/A/NE/RP/�� �Z�*P/�� 	�Z	�*	Q/�� 		�Z� [
�ED�**.D�@$�"B����D�**kD	� NZ�yes-Z�yes$�"""Bc@
�	�
x@��D�**D�R"D�D�D�D�D�GD�NE:
�%D�D�D�D�D�""B�Z�� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""BNE{�?�Z�Z�Z�[�C��(�	XolaniG�����\	����\	�����\	����
�\	�����\�����\����\����\����\	����\[
����ED�**.D�@$�"B������D�**kD	� NZ�yes-\Zyes$�"""B9���
�#D�**$
�Bp
b��
�ZD�**CD�R*%D�D�D�D�D�"B���� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B *8|��	�"D�Yes
B8����"D�Yes
B�����mD�S
@QD�E
@.D�NE
@
""B6���� D�E
B>����(D�Yes
�
B� GGGGGGGGGGGGG!�G���\��G���\��G���\�_G���\_G���\_G���\_G���\_G���\_G���\	`G���\[
�G���ED�**.D�@$�"B�[G��
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-\
yes$�"""B9�G���#D�**$
�Bp
�G���ZD�**CD�R*%D�D�D�D�D�"B���� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B *8z���"D�Yes
B8���	�"D�Yes
B�����mD�S
@QD�E
@.D�NE
@
""B6���� D�E
B>����(D�Yes
�
B� GGGGGGGGGGGGG!�G���\	�G���\	��G��	
�\	�[
�G���ED�**.D�@$�"B�[G��
��D�**kD	� NZ�yes-\Zyes$�"""B9��#D�**$
�Bp
��ZD�**CD�R*%D�D�D�D�D�"B���� ��Z	�NE	NElZ	�A*LZ	�E*,Z	� 	 *R"""B *8z�"D�Yes
B8��"D�Yes
B���mD�S
@QD�E
@.D�NE
@
""B6�� D�E
B>�
�(D�Yes
�
B�4�u�$T�����}C558�5..�6??��		
�	Ye				


	

	
	
	B		
		
		
	
	
		
		
					
					

		

	

	
		
				
		
	

	


	
	
			
				
	
	
			
			
	
		
	
	
		
	
						

			
						
		���@�0��(	�
�0�n�
�0
c�4��N����Chart 1�����]@	 ZO��PPPZaajk����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�"@XX333333�?333333�?3�&�<3�P�H��@�0�(	�
�@k@^3�d23�����
���	MRR
RR��I�3~SS43Q:
*Resubmission scoresQ;Q;Q��3_��M
ff����6	f����O������������������������������������@��"�B����������� ������������� �������������`	MM<RRRR�����8�]hSS4ESS4D$% ������0�43O&RQRR�������SS4$% ��������43O&RQ4FA�5�3O��^PU3 b�RRRRVVd-&R!���������u��,���O���
Ia.�(�IaQRSS43* &R!�����!�����RR���u��,���u��,��-$͒SS4523��M
���	MRR��͒n]�SS43�"
4SS4�D��^PU% Ax
3O��������+&SQ23��M
���NMRRRR��͒�]�SS4'�<�2���(\���
Ia/SS4��-$͒��
Ia[SS
4eee�*�Iaven-US���I
>�@K͒��ʒ�A



�$	�"�	Sheet4gg����
	ZO����C
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?M~Epson EPL-6200r Series2���	�4dXXA4 210 x 297 mm�XX,4�4�dd	6
@XX+����DLLName32=EPO_B4AC.DLLZ`�"	dX333333�?333333�?�&�<3U}$	C}IC}IC}I}mC}IC}$	C}	$	Crr� rY@ rg` rF@ rJ�Fr@r@r,@r,@	r,@
r@r@r@
r@r,@r,@,@,@,@,@,@ ,` ,` ; ,�JIjj8jjm�� �Z	�	Ass No&N�� �Z
�	M3.A01�'j8j888n�� �Z�
Eval by( �� �Z�
Michael)�
MNS�w�@�Z����@�Z�R����J�
��

*�
N��
N��
���
���
f��

C�
fI�� �Z�	Geoff Jf�� �Z�
VermaakKa�� 
�Z�
Belindaa�n�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BE=�n�� �'Z�* :�B �$@�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*�$@
��.$L��A	,��,��B!	ee�� �D�D�
G��(�
�

L��
Belindao$@�D���GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGqF�� �Z�	Geoff Gf�� �Z�
MokwenaLe�� 
�Z�Thaboa�o�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BNE=�o�� �'Z�* :�B	 E/A/NE/R�@�Z
�_�@�ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B�@�
G��(�
Thaboo@	�D�F�� �Z�Nico G �� �Z�
NyaqelaLe�� 
�Z�	Funekaa�k�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BNE=�k�� �'Z�* :�B	 E/A/NE/R�@
�Z
�_�@�ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B�@�
G��(�
	Funekao@��L��F�� �Z�Mike G �� �Z�van WijkLW�� 
�Z�Heinricha�r�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BE=�r�� �'Z�* :�B �$@�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*�$@�
G��(�
Heinricho$@�F�� �Z�Nico G �� �Z�

TiroyaboneLy�� 
�Z�	Leratoa�t�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BA=�t�� �'Z�* :�B � @�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*� @�
G��(	�
	Leratoo @�	F�� 	�Z	�	Billy 	Gy�� 	�Z	�
Moodley	Ll�� 	
�Z	�
Nerissaa	�s�� �KZ	�*:	�/Z	�NE:	� "BNE=	�s�� �'Z	�* :	�B	 E/A/NE/R	�@	�Z	
�_	�@
�ID	�E*2Z	�NE:	
�:	
�"B	�@�		
G��(
�

Nerissa	o@�
F�� 
�Z
�Nico 
G �� 
�Z
�Zuma
L �� 

�Z
�Phumlania
�l�� �KZ
�*:
�/Z
�NE:
� "BNE=
�l�� 	�'Z
�* :
�B	 E/A/NE/R
�@�Z

�_
�@�ID
�E*2Z
�NE:

�:

�"B
�@
�


G��(�
Phumlani
o@�F�� �Z�Mike G �� �Z�GovenderLn�� 
�Z�
Rachaela�a�� 	�KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BA=�a�� 
�'Z�* :�B � @�Z
�_��� 	�ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*� @
�
G��(�

Rachaelo @�F�� �Z�Mike G �� �Z�MothilalLi�� 
�Z�
Reshikaa�i�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BA=�i�� �'Z�* :�B � @�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*� @�
G��(
�

Reshikao @�
F�� 
�Z
�	Celia 
Ga�� 
�Z
�Mathetha
Le�� 

�Z
�Samkea
�e�� �KZ
�*:
�/Z
�NE:
� "BA=
�e�� �'Z
�* :
�B 
� @
�Z

�_
��� �ID
�E*2Z
�NE:

�:

�"B*
� @�


G��(�
Samke
o @�F�� �Z�	Billy Gy�� �Z�	RatlouLo�� 
�Z�Seanea�e�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "B =�e�� 
�'Z�* :�B	ASSESS�S�� �Z
�*_��ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B���(�*
G��(�
Seaneoe��(�*Fe�� �Z�Nico G �� �Z�ChikumbuLu�� 
�Z�
Silencea�n�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BA=�n�� �'Z�* :�B � @�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*� @�
G��(�

Silenceo @
�F�� �Z�	Geoff Gf�� �Z�LouwLf�� 
�Z�Silkea�e�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BE=�e�� �'Z�* :�B �$@�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*�$@�
G��(�
Silkeo$@	�F�� �Z�	Geoff Gf�� �Z�	MabenaLn�� 
�Z�Sthea�n�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BA=�n�� �'Z�* :�B � @�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*� @�
G��(�
Stheo @�F�� �Z�	Celia Ga�� �Z�MalulekeLl�� 
�Z�Tanyaa�a�� �KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "B =��'Z�* :�B��Z
�_��ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B��
G��(�
Tanyao
�F�� �Z�	Billy Gy�� �Z�

MathabathaLa�� 
�Z�	Trevora�o�� 
�KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BA=�o�� �'Z�* :�B � @�Z
�_��� �ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B*� @�
G��(�
	Trevoro @�F�� �Z�	Billy Gy�� �Z�
MandidiLi�� 
�Z�	Xolania�n�� 
�KZ�*:�/Z�NE:� "BNE=�n�� �'Z�* :�B	 E/A/NE/R�@�Z
�_�@�ID�E*2Z�NE:
�:
�"B�@�
G��(�
	Xolanio@�����\�D���\�D���\�����\������\^H����HZ�*	$�.Z�NE:
�"B9�����#D�	$�$�B�����\�������\�������\�V����\VVV���\^EV���HZ�*	$�.Z�NE:
�"B9gV���#D�	$�$�B�V���\�V���\��V��	�\�^EV���HZ�*	$�.Z�NE:
�"B9gV���#D�	$�$�B�k@@@@@@�6N/�t���@TECDBCC@SC<<0DBNN�|	@				
	
B		
�	B		
	
G	G	G	
G	
G	G	G		G		G
		
			


	

	
					

	X				

	
		
			
			
	
	
				

		
			
	
	
		���P�4��(	�
�4�n�
�4
c�4��N����Chart 1�	�A@&�]@	 ZO��PPPZaajk����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�"@XX333333�?333333�?3�&�<3�P�H��D�0�(	�
�D�/3�d23�����
���	MRR
RR��I�3~SS43Q:
Final ScoreQ�;Q;

Q��3_��M
ff����6	f����O������������������������������������@��"�B����������� ������������� �������������`	MM<RRRR�����8�]hSS4ESS4D$% �����0�83O&RQRR�������SS4$% �������83O&RQ4FA��/3O�M#3 b�RRRRVVd-&R!���������u��,���O���
Ia.�(�IaQRSS43* &R!�����!�����RR���u��,���u��,��-$͒SS4523��M
���	MRR��͒n]�SS43�"
4SS4�D��M#% ���
3O�������r+&SQ23��M
���NMRRRR��͒�]�SS4'�<�9���(\���
Ia/PSS4��-$͒��
Ia[SS
4eee�*�Iaven-US��I�B
>�@K͒��ʒ�A
�$	��	Sheet5gg����
	ZO���S�T
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�",�333333�?333333�?��&�<3U,,,,�
�
�
�
�
�
 �
"�
�
!��<*8>�@��			�	Sheet6gg����D
	ZO��tZ�e
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?MHP LaserJet Professional CP102�4��	XXSDDMHP LaserJet Professional CP1020X																	Z������������d����'��4��"	dX333333�?333333�?�&�<3U}�C�Column AColumn Bh�CR�CR�Cw w � + � + 	; 
w w w 
w ; ; 
; 
; 
; �
��
�.�
�-�
�/�
�0~
��@@���G��A�
�1��
	�+�

u,�
��
�2�
�3�
v4�
v5~
v@@v*���A�
v6w�
	�+�

y,�

�+�
��
�F�
�G�
vH�
vI~
v<@v��I�A�
vJw�
	x+�

y,�

�+�
��
�T�
�U�
rV�
rW~
r8@r�����A�
rXs�
	t+�

u,�

|,�
��
�A�
�B�
rC�
rD~
r;@z��(��A�
rEs�
	t+�

u,�

}~�
��
�d�
�c�
ve�
vf~
v�D@{�����A�
vgw�
	x+�

y,�

}~�
��
�L�
�K�
rM�
rN~
rB@r�e��A�
rOs�
	t+�

u,�

}~�
��
�7�
�8�
r9�
r:~
r�D@r����A�
r;s�
	t+�

u,�

}~�
��
�Q�
�P�
v/�
vR~
v?@v�|��A�
vSw�
	x+�

y,�

}~�
	��
	�i�
	�h�	�������C
�
	
}~�

��

�Z�

�Y�

v[�

v\~

v<@
v���A�

v]
w�

	x+�


y,�


}~�
��
�<�
�=�
v>�
v?~
vA@vH�<�B�
v@w�
	x+�

y,�

}~�
��
�'�
�&�
(�
)~
?@���2�A�
*��
	�+�

�,�

}~�

��

�^�

�_�

r`�

ra~

r�@@
raD��A�

rb
s�

	t+�


u,�


}~����������C
�

}~�pp������qC
�

}~�

}~�

}~�

}~�*�
h���������R����,,���Q`�+*8�Q�(	�
�8�z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 40View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`���(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 41http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`���&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 42http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`�����z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 43View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=109yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`���(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 44http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`���&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 45http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&`�����z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 46View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=118yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`���(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 47http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`���&��
�	8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 48http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&	`�����z�
�
8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 49View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=108yX��;H�,�]ą'c���T�]&
`���(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 50http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		T�]&`���&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 51http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

T�]&`�����z�
�
8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 52View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=115yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&
`���(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 53http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`���&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 54http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&`�����z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 55View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=112yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`��<(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 56http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`��<&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 57http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&`��<��z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 58View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=114yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`��<(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 59http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`��<&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 60http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&`��<��z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 61View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=117yX��;H�,�]ą'c���o�]&`��<(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 62http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		o�]&`��<&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 63http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

o�]&`��<��z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 64View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=116yX��;H�,�]ą'c���o�]&`��<(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 65http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		o�]&`��<&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 66http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

o�]&`��<��z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 67View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=120yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&`��<(� �
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 68http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&`��<&��
�8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 69http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&`��<��z�
�8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 70View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=119yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&`��<(� �
� 8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 71http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119yX��;H�,�]ą'c���	
	
��]& `��<&��
�!8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 72http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119yX��;H�,�]ą'c���



��]&!`��<��z�
�"8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 73View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=107yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&"`��<(� �
�#8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 74http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107yX��;H�,�]ą'c���	
	
��]&#`��<&��
�$8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 75http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107yX��;H�,�]ą'c���



��]&$`��<��z�
�%8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 76View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=111yX��;H�,�]ą'c���T�]&%`��<(� �
�&8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 77http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		T�]&&`��<&��
�'8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 78http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

T�]&'`��<��z�
�(8
��@��A�
?��?����
����
ViewPicture 90View���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c�����]&(`��<(� �
�)8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 91http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c���		��]&)`��<&��
�*8
�����A�?��?����j���
detailPicture 92http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/images/detail.gif���y������K����y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c���

��]&*`��>�@���
��

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111yX��;H�,�]ą'c����



���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107yX��;H�,�]ą'c����



���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109yX��;H�,�]ą'c����		���y������K�ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c����

���y������K�hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113���y������K��http://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113yX��;H�,�]ą'c���	Sheet7gg����D
	ZO��q�
d����MbP?_*+��%,����&ffffff�?'ffffff�?(�?)�?�",�333333�?333333�?h�&�<3U>�@���	Sheet8gg����D
��
��Oh��+'��0�HPhx��
���Zulch L�tterJuliaMicrosoft Excel@��UN�@��ܪ;)�@�ZT�a���
��՜.��+,��D��՜.��+,��x4	PXdlt|�
���HPFirst Submission Assessment First Submission ScoreResubmission Assessment Resubmission Score Final ScoreData ValuesStudents and FaciliratorsSheet3AchieveContentNoNotachievednull*'First Submission Assessment '!Print_Area&'Resubmission Assessment '!Print_AreaStatusYesNoWorksheets
Named Ranges	�o 8@_PID_HLINKS�A�o�[A�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=211U�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=211QG�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=211Z@�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=200T�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=200PF�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=200SJ�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=199]�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=199YL�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=199ZA�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=201T�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=201PG�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=201ZF�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=206T�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=206P@�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=206SK�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=198]�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=198YM�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=198ZE�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=205T�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=205PC�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=205ZB�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=202T�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=202PD�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=202[@�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=210U�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=210QF�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=210RA�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=182\�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=182XG�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=182SE�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=196]�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=196YC�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=196[B�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=212U�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=212QD�����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=212ZD�����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=204T�����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=204PB����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=204RJ����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=189\����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=189XL����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=189RB����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=181\����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=181XD����ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=181SD����Ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=197]����jhttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=197YB����	ihttps://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=197k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=113MB����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113m:����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113k1����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=109LH����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109m;����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=118MI����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118m:����	8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118k1����
8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=108LI����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108m;����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108k0����
8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=115MD����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115m:����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=112MC����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112m:����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=114ME����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114m:����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=117MF����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117m:����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=116MG����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116m:����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116k3����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=120NA����8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120m9����8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120k0����8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=119MH���� 8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119m:����!8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119k1����"8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=107LF����#8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107m;����$8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107k0����%8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=111M@����&8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111m:����'8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111k0����(8Hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentsview.php?CCEStudentID=113MB����)8ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113m:����*8hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113MBihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=113LHihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109m;hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=109MIihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=118LIihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108m;hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=108MDihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=115MCihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=112ME
ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=114MFihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117m:
hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=117MG	ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=116NAihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120m9hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=120MHihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=119LFihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107m;hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=107M@ihttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentAssignmentslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111m:hhttp://www.cesa.co.za/cceconvenors/CCEStudentActivitieslist.php?showmaster=CCEStudents&CCEStudentID=111	

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������	

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������	

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������	

 !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Root Entry�������� �F����Workbook��������������SummaryInformation(�����DocumentSummaryInformation8������������@r